Tibial displacement with stifle joint flexion and cranial cruciate ligament transection in the dog. An ex vivo study using a robotic simulator.

Authors
Kanno N1, Hara Y, Fukano S, Fujie H, Ochi H, Fujita Y, Yasuji H, Nezu Y, Yogo T, Tagawa M.
Date
2014 Jul
Journal
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol
Volume
27
Number
4
Pages
277-84

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) transection on stifle stability at three different stifle joint flexion angles using a robotic system. Methods: This was an ex vivo biomechanical study. Stifles (n = 6) were collected from the cadavers of Beagles weighing 10.5-12.0 kg. Six stifle joints were dissected, potted, and secured to the manipulator arms of a robotic simulator. With the stifle joint angle maintained at either hyperextension (151°), 135° or 90°, stability was assessed by application of a 50 N load in either the cranial-caudal (CrCd test) or proximal-distal (PD test) directions. The stifle was given a cranial-caudal load of 50 N (CrCd test). A proximal-distal compression load of 50 N was then administered by the manipulator (proximal-distal test: PD test). The change in three-dimensional kinematics of the intact and the CrCL-transected stifles was compared between hyperextension, and 135° and 90° flexion for the CrCd and PD load conditions. A value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The cranial tibial displacements in the PD tests of the CrCL-transected stifles at 135° (8.4 ± 1.2 mm) and at 90° (8.1 ± 1.9 mm) were significantly greater than the displacement at 151.5° (5.1 ± 1.6 mm) (p = 0.004 and p = 0.012 respectively). Clinical significance: The canine stifle exhibited the most instability when the stifle flexion angle was 135°.